With your icon set draft in front of you:
Prepare yourself for the critique mindset.
[Name], will you pray for us today?
Good icons need both form (beauty) and function (clarity) — excellence in one doesn't excuse failure in the other
You'll know how to evaluate icons for both usability (does it communicate?) and aesthetics (is it cohesive?)
You'll understand simplicity, recognizability, and consistency as the foundation of good icon design
You'll have started vectorizing your icons in Illustrator or Figma
Functional / Usability
If someone can't understand it, the icon fails — regardless of how beautiful it is.
Guiding questions:
Formal / Aesthetics
Similar strokes, proportions, and stylistic forms.
Same format as Round 1
Guiding questions:
Reduce to essential forms; remove unnecessary detail
Users should identify meaning instantly
Unified stroke weight, proportions, and style across the set
Round 1 tested recognizability. Round 2 tested consistency.
What must this communicate?
How do I execute it beautifully?
A brilliant idea poorly executed fails.
A beautifully crafted solution to the wrong problem also fails.
Are form and function ever in tension?
From sketch to scalable
Due Day 4 (Wednesday, Jan 21) — submit PDF by end of class
Day 4 is a work session day; come prepared to finalize.
Vectors scale infinitely without quality loss.
Icons need to work at many sizes — vectors are essential.
Tips for consistency:
What is the best process for learning new digital programs?
Vectorizing Work Session — Begin translating your icons into Illustrator or Figma
Choose based on preference and career goals · Apply critique feedback
Homework — Continue vectorizing; bring progress to Day 4
A3 due Day 4 — Submit PDF to Learning Suite by end of class